An essential element of leadership
With the wisdom of hindsight, some leaders in history stand out: Churchill, Lincoln, Thatcher and Reagan are but a few. Zelensky in Ukraine and Netanyahu in Israel are currently facing the battle for their country’s lives as have others who went before them.
None of them was/is perfect. None had it easy. Yet all performed with moral clarity and courage of conviction to deal with the enormous challenges they confronted at the time of peak threat.
Winston Churchill
Ignorant callow youth wallowing in freedoms so hard won by the blood of forebears, who want to deface and destroy statues of Churchill because of some perceived affront in his, or his family’s past, nearly a century ago judged by today’s standards, have no idea of the challenges he confronted to hold spirits high and win victory against Hitler and rampaging Nazism.
Churchill had to deal, alone, with German sympathisers, barely concealed antisemitism and appeasers at home, to envision with moral clarity the necessity of defeating Nazism to retain cultural freedoms enjoyed by Britain and the Commonwealth nations, then drive the effort forward to clear victory. Stupendous in fact! True leadership!
Churchill had been a soldier who experienced war at first hand. He not only knew his country’s cultural values and freedoms were at stake, but also what it took to win: total annihilation of the enemy. Moral clarity stirred the courage to pursue the only acceptable end.
Abraham Lincoln
Lincoln had little going for him in status, appearance or voice as did Churchill. What he did have was similar moral clarity of purpose – to unite the fledgling states of America. Having been elected, for two weeks he travelled by train from La Rue County in Kentucky, crisscrossing many of the eastern states towards Washington, stopping three and four times a day, to speak directly to the crowds of people who gathered. At all times he was under threat of assassination. Plain spun sincerity emanating from his rustic origins and his deep, sincere beliefs won people round, though not the elites. A lesson for us today.
Inauguration was not the end of travail. Once more Lincoln needed to draw on inner resources of courage and moral clarity to lead the Union against the southern states in a civil war to defeat slavery and lay the foundation for equal opportunity for Black people. It was a bitter and costly war through which Lincoln held true to his moral purpose – to unite the country. Reverberations are still felt today.
Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan
On election, both Thatcher, PM of Great Britain and Reagan, President of the USA faced challenging domestic issues as well as the Cold War with Russia, leading to the fall of the Berlin Wall and break-up of the Russian Empire.
Thatcher, a shopkeeper’s daughter, took on intransigent unions crippling the country to restore Britain’s economy. When the Irish Republican Army bombed the hotel in which the Conservative Party was holding its conference, Thatcher next day once more stood on the dais, moral clarity evident in her much- quoted phrase, “this lady is not for turning”. Again, Thatcher’s leadership shone when Argentina sought to take over the Falkland Islands, she acted decisively and was successful.
Reagan was a B-Grade actor turned Governor of California who won the 40th Presidency of the United States. Hangover from his acting days was his mellifluous voice and ability to deliver a line or a joke certainly helped win support. Critics felt he was too old at 73, yet Reagan showed moral clarity to do what was best for the people and the country. In his first term, Reagan implemented “Reaganomics”, which involved economic deregulation and cuts in both taxes and government spending during a period of stagflation. He escalated an arms race and transitioned Cold War policy away from détente with the Soviet Union, pressure which brought the downfall of the Berlin Wall and fragmentation of the Soviet Union. A period of relative world peace ensued.
Volodymyr Zelensky
Although qualified as a lawyer, Zelensky became the 6th President of Ukraine following a successful TV career which provided high profile and media skills beneficial for his present role.
Upon unprovoked invasion of Ukraine by Russia, Zelensky declined a US offer of escape, saying “the fight is here. I need weapons not a flight out”. That moral clarity to defend Ukraine has proven costly in manpower and munitions. Yet the people of Ukraine, whose previous experience of being under the heavy jackboot of Russian domination, which brought starvation and death of millions, remains fresh in their memory.
NATO support has been forthcoming as nations seek to avoid once again becoming part of dictator Putin’s dream of a reconstituted Russian empire, little different from Solzhenitsyn’s grim, totalitarian description of the Gulag Archipelago. Oppressive prospects sharpen the sense of moral clarity about what needs to be done.
Benjamin Netanyahu
Netanyahu boldly confronts the fight of his country’s life, assailed on so many fronts with threats of annihilation from evil actors in the region and hapless media abroad:
- Hamas in Gaza who massacred, tortured and raped over 1200 people, injured almost 5,000 and kidnapped 253 men, women and children on October 7, continues to use its own people as human shields.
- Hezbollah raining down thirty rockets a day on Israel from Lebanon, displacing almost 100,000 residents.
- Houthis from Yemen attacking Red Sea shipping and launching rockets into southern Israel.
- Iran which funds Hamas, Hezbollah and Houthi proxies, launched 350 missiles at Israel and strategically funds useful idiots in the west to swing public opinion against Israel and Jews through protest on Uni campuses, on the streets and disruption to economy and social harmony through street sit-ins. If only the useful idiots understood how they are being played. Should Iran be successful, its plan is to destroy western civilization. Those idiots will then have no right to protest, at least not without facing prison, torture and death. Ask the Iranians.
- Joe Biden, President of the US, who speaks out of both sides of his mouth, ostensibly supporting Israel in the fight for its life, yet anchoring that country’s ability to proceed with the speed and purpose necessary to defeat the enemy and return hostages.
- UN agencies, ICC and ICJ which aim to skewer Netanyahu and Israel for war crimes, allegedly starving Gazans who appear overweight with man-boobs in most images. In Gaza starvation always threatens – next month.
- Various other self-important politicians with no skin in the game, critical of Israeli action in the face of desperation.
In addition to dealing with external threats, within Israel, Netanyahu must deal with the machinations of an activist court trying to nail him, as well as pressure from hostage families who want him to do more to bring their loved ones home. Yet he has displayed Churchillian fortitude of an experienced soldier to hold his war cabinet together and proceed with confidence, courage and moral clarity towards initial stated goals of retrieving the hostages and destroying Hamas so that it no longer poses the threat promised to exterminate Israel and the Jews, who deserve and desire to live in peace.
Australian leadership
There is no way we can attribute the Australian government with moral clarity. With regards support for democracies of Ukraine and Israel, PM Albanese has been limp, still providing Hamas with funding through UNWRA despite UNWRA being exposed as intertwined with terrorist organisation Hamas.
We could expect a PM with moral clarity to have the backbone to challenge pro-Palestine/anti-Semitic protestors to abide by the laws of this country they hate, or else go back to somewhere they find more suitable – like Iran, Lebanon or Turkey. Alternatively, benefits and citizenship could be stripped. A PM of that calibre would glean more respect for the principle of standing up for this country, its values and what is right, rather than pandering to Islamist enclaves, who are emboldened by appeasement to their evil. Appeasement never works.
Business leaders’ virtue signaling support for the Voice has been callow and ill considered, as has been their dismissal of importance to shareholders and customers of Australia Day and Anzac Day. Woke yes, moral clarity, no.
Hope for the future
While domination by dictators and manipulation of the ignorant in the west is dismal, hope springs from the moral clarity expressed by particular commentators as they gain traction, drawing listeners to non-woke reality. Amongst these are:
- Douglas Murray, British author and journalist, who challenges Palestinian belief structures.
- Jordan Peterson, Canadian psychologist and author
- Eylon Levy, journalist, former representative of the Israeli government
- Mosab Hassan Yousef, son of the founder of Hamas, raised in Gaza, who spent ten years working for Israeli security, saving lives on both sides.
- Caroline Glick, podcaster and author
- Ricky Gervais, British comedian who disarms the woke with humour.
In Australia, we have a few, not limited to: plain speaking Senator Matt Canavan; TV commentators Peta Credlin, Andrew Bolt and Paul Murray; Senator James Patterson and Andrew Hastie; erudite philosopher and economist, Henry Ergas who has a Friday column in The Australian. Most of these are accessible on YouTube, as a change from their ABC bias, and a welcome dose of hope. Best to be informed with a diversity of views rather than joining the ranks of the rabid willfully ignorant out protesting for the thrill of joining the mob. Moral clarity derived from sound knowledge inspires courage and confidence to make right decisions and proceed.